Skip to main content

Logic group

The union of all the seminar of the Logic group: Logic (Wed 4pm), Model Theory (Wed 2pm), Set Theory (Wed 1pm).

Search results for “”

Results 1 to 10 of 37

Lorna Gregory (University of East Anglia) – Representation Type, Decidability and Pseudofinite-dimensional Modules over Finite-dimensional Algebras

Date
@ RSL13
Category

The representation type of a finite-dimensional k-algebra is an algebraic measure of how hard it is to classify its finite-dimensional indecomposable modules.

Intuitively, a finite-dimensional k-algebra is of tame representation type if we can classify its finite-dimensional modules and wild representation type if its module category contains a copy of the category of finite-dimensional modules of all other finite-dimensional k-algebras. An archetypical (although not finite-dimensional) tame algebra is k[x]. The structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a PID describes its finite-dimensional modules. Drozd’s famous dichotomy theorem states that all finite-dimensional algebras are either wild or tame.

The tame/wild dividing line is not seen by standard model theoretic invariants or even the more specialised invariants coming from Model Theory of Modules. A long-standing conjecture of Mike Prest claims that a finite-dimensional algebra has decidable theory of modules if and only if it is of tame representation type. More recently, I conjectured that a finite-dimensional algebra has decidable theory of (pseudo)finite dimensional modules if and only if it is of tame representation type. This talk will focus on recent work providing evidence for the second conjecture.

Sebastiaan Terwijn (Radboud University) – Computability theory and combinatory algebra

Date
@ Roger Stevens LT 13 (10.13)
Category

Partial combinatory algebras (pcas) are abstract models of computation. They are one of the earliest type of model that emerged in the 1930's when mathematicians were trying to define what it means to be computable. Notions such as recursive functions (used by Gödel in the proof of his incompleteness theorems), Turing machines, combinatory algebra and lambda calculus each turned out to be useful in the development of the theory of computation in their own way. Pcas are also used in the study of constructive mathematics. They play a key role in the connections between constructive mathematics, proof theory, and computability, and also serve as a basis for models of constructive mathematics.

In this talk we will give a quick review of the basics of combinatory algebra, and discuss some of the key examples, such as Kleene's models $\mathcal{K}_1$ (which describes the classical setting for computation on the natural numbers), $\mathcal{K}_2$ (which does the same for the real numbers), and Scott's graph model. We then discuss recent results about embeddings and completions of pcas, and in particular the complexity of various embeddings. Depending on time, we will also discus the complexity of the isomorphism problem, extensionality, and ordinal analysis of pcas.

Angus Matthews (University of Leeds) – The model theory of C_exp, part II: The Ax-Schanuel theorem

Date
@ MALL 1
Category

Having outlined the problems, this seminar will be devoted to describing the tools which have been developed to help us solve them. First and foremost of these is the Ax-Schanuel theorem, the functional equivalent of Schanuel's conjecture. We will give a proof, and then discuss how this is applied to prove weak Zilber-Pink, another highly useful result. Given time, we will also explain how it was used by Bays-Kirby to remove Schanuel's conjecture from the list of requirements necessary for Zilber's Quasi-minimality conjecture.

Mervyn Tong (University of Leeds) – Where does homogeneity come from?

Date
@ MALL, online
Category

Everyone loves a good decomposition. How can we break down a mathematical object — a graph, a group, or a function — efficiently into well-behaved (or regular) parts? And what conditions can we place on these objects to guarantee a higher degree of regularity, such as homogeneity? It turns out an excellent source of such conditions is model-theoretic dividing lines, that is, tameness properties of (first-order) structures. This is not a coincidence. In this talk, I will dive into the deep theory of these dividing lines in search of the source of homogeneity.

David Chodounský (Czech Academy of Sciences) – Games and chromatic numbers of definable graphs

Date
@ MALL, online
Category

A graph has a countable chromatic number if the vertices can be labeled by natural numbers so that no edge has the same label on both ends. Verifying this property for a given graph can be somewhat difficult; consider e.g. the graph of points in the Euclidean space $ℝ^n$ connected with an edge iff their distance is a rational number. The countable chromatic number of this graph is an easy observation for $n=1$, but a nontrivial result for $n>1$ (Komjath, Schmerl). I will introduce an infinite determined game which provides a simple criterion for a definable (analytic on a Polish space) graph to be countably chromatic; it is sufficient to verify that the second player has a winning strategy. Using this criterion we can e.g. easily resolve the example of $ℝ^n$, as well as deduce interesting consequences on the structure of uncountably chromatic definable graphs.

The talk is based on the paper Chodounský, Zapletal: Two graph games (2024).

Andrew DeLapo (UConn) – Index Sets and Computable Categoricity of CSC Spaces

Date
@ MALL, online
Category

Given a topology on the natural numbers, how complicated is it to describe? To answer this question with tools from computability theory, we will restrict to the context of countable second-countable (CSC) topological spaces. One approach is to assign an index to each computable CSC space and determine the arithmetic complexity of the set of CSC spaces with some property. Another approach comes from computable structure theory; for example, given two computable copies of a CSC space, does there exist a computable homeomorphism between them? In this talk, we will explore these approaches and apply them in three running examples: the indiscrete, discrete, and initial segment topologies.

Irene Heinrich (TU Darmstadt) – Classifying coloured ultrahomogeneous graphs

Date
@ MALL, online
Category

NOTES: the speaker will be online.
I will give a talk on several recent results regarding ultrahomogeneous graphs. A relational structure R is ultrahomogeneous if every isomorphism of finite induced substructures of R extends to an automorphism of R. We classify the finite vertex-colored oriented ultrahomogeneous graphs and the finite vertex-colored undirected graphs. The classifications comprise new general methods which govern how graphs can be combined or extended to create new ultrahomogeneous graphs. Further, we extend a classic theorem of Cameron (every 5-tuple regular graph is already ultrahomogeneous) to the setting of colored graphs.

This is joint work with Sofia Brenner, Eda Kaja, Thomas Schneider, and Pascal Schweitzer.